Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
economic development 171
indiana 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

June 23, 2008

Public Policy and Pie Economics

I was recently invited to attend town hall style debate between members of a local fire department and an anti-property tax group. For those of you who are sporadic readers of this column, it is important for me to clarify that I have recently angered both groups. It seems my research on government consolidation and property taxes fell between each of their lobby positions. So, I thought, it was likely the invitation was extended as a sort of team building exercise by both groups. Perhaps lynching an economist would pave the way for more constructive dialogue. Sadly, my calendar was full and I could not attend. But, it did get me thinking I ought to explain a bit about how economists evaluate public policy decisions like tax reform and government consolidation. 

First, economists worry most about what I call the ‘size of the pie’ problem. We like to see policies in place that provide more goods and services for all. The technical jargon for this process is ‘welfare maximizing.’ Now, before you anti-consumerists out there bemoan this objective, keep in mind by goods and services I also mean clean air and water, health, national security and a well functioning justice system, not just consumer electronics. 

So, it is completely consistent with market economics for me to think that air pollution should be regulated or taxed to mitigate its negative impacts on a third party. Clearly, the size of the tax or the scope of the regulation matters, but the basic principle is one that is shared by all economists I know. The same is true with other issues involving public funding. 

Economists also care about what I call the ‘slice of the pie problem’ or who gets how much but not in the way most folks would suppose. Economists like to see rewards for the economic value of labor, and we insist property rights protect the investment and innovations of those expending that labor. So, I don’t mind that Bill Gates makes tons more money than me. It is this incentive that causes the pie to get bigger through innovation. 

Economists also don’t much like policies that distort individual behavior. We think folks are mostly rational, and can be left to make grown-up decisions. Fighting over the slice of the pie, or carefully redistributing the pieces so we all get the same size leaves us all a smaller “economic pie.”

At least this economist is not so naïve to think that everyone thinks this way. Interest groups exist solely to fight over their slice of the pie. The anti-property tax lobby wants lower taxes on them (even if it shifts the burden to others). The firefighters worry about their job security (even if many Hoosier cities have twice the national per capita average of firefighters). So I understand that people who struggle over their slice are going to be upset when they are scolded by an economist armed with facts. In the end, rational people armed with facts are a lobbyist’s nightmare.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/108/public-policy-and-pie-economics

Tags: law and public policy, economics


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close