Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

Time to Fix Economic Development PolicyAllocating tax dollars to land development won’t cause economic growth.

The Unanticipated Effects of SB1Businesses, governments and households may all feel the effects.

The Stupidest of PoliciesThis whipsawing of tariff rates has unnerved financial markets, which on Wednesday, were toying with a liquidity crisis.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 261
economics 201
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 171
economic development 171
budget and spending 145
taxes 144
law and public policy 142
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

July 21, 2008

No Simple Solutions for Property Taxes

There have been a lot of Op-Ed pieces about Indiana’s tax system these past few weeks. A common theme is that our tax system is hard to understand and full of unnecessary complexities. There was a time when I too worried excessively about the intricacy of the tax system. But that was when I was younger, knew less about the world and expected simple answers to all the world’s problems. Now that I am a bit older, know a bit more about tax and spending and have come to expect that simple answers are usually only helpful for simple problems, my concern for state taxes has abated. Here’s why. 

The real angst about taxes (which has appeared in papers statewide over the past few weeks) is about the difficulty in understanding how the system works and how different taxes do different things. This is mostly misplaced worry. 

There is some truth to tax complexity, but it lies only in the completion of forms, not the administration of taxes. The complexity of the tax system reflects the complexity of economic life. A more simple tax system would be as unfair (by that I mean in distorting taxpayer behavior) as any combination of taxes currently around in the U.S. Let’s take Indiana as an example. 

Hoosiers pay income, property, sales and use taxes along with assorted fees. Most all our transactions involve taxation of some sort. Let’s review some basic principles.

Higher taxes cause people to do less of the activity. In economic jargon, this means they act as a disincentive to all things from working harder to buying a more expensive house. However, the level of distortion changes both with the type of item taxed and the rate of the tax. 

Generally, the lower the tax rate, the less consumers care about taxes. Also, the more important the item is to us, the less tax policy alters our purchasing patterns. So, a 7% sales tax rate is less than half as distortionary as a 14% sales tax rate. And, we care less about taxes on insulin than we do about taxes on soda pop. 

Taxes also affect folks in different times of their lives. Retirees, who spend more proportionately on food and travel but make less money, may favor income taxes over property taxes. While younger workers, who make more income, but have less valuable homes may prefer property taxes. (This might also speak to the demographics of the property tax debate). 

Different types of taxes also affect government administration. Property taxes in particular focus tax revenues to the locations where costs are incurred (the household). Nothing holds government accountable like local property taxes.

To economists, the mantra is “broad tax, low rate.” To do this requires many different tax instruments that reflect the complexity of our free markets. Calls for a simple “flat tax” or simple tax policies are too good to be true.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/104/no-simple-solutions-for-property-taxes

Tags: taxes


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close