Center for Business and Economic Research - Ball State University


CBER Data Center
Projects and PublicationsEconomic IndicatorsWeekly CommentaryCommunity Asset InventoryManufacturing Scorecard

About

Commentaries are published weekly and distributed through the Indianapolis Business Journal and many other print and online publications. Disclaimer

RSS Feed

Disclaimer

The views expressed in these commentaries do not reflect those of Ball State University or the Center for Business and Economic Research.

Recent

Previewing the Long-Term Effects of TariffsThe dominant effect of the Trump tariffs will be to raise production costs on almost every American manufacturing firm.

It’s TDS to Suppose These Tariffs Are WorkingTrump has pushed the U.S. into an economic downturn that will be especially hurtful to Hoosiers.

Trump’s Tariff Recession Is HereMy new forecast, completed in late April, predicts a national recession began as early as March in reaction to Trump’s tarriffs.

Two Key Economic Lessons in One BillHoosiers face trade-offs and opportunity costs in the wake of SEA1.

View archives

Top Tags

jobs and employment 262
economics 203
state and local government 188
education 186
indiana 173
economic development 171
taxes 146
budget and spending 145
law and public policy 144
workforce and human capital 139
Browse all tags
Reporter / Admin Login

January 4, 2015

Oil Prices in 2015

Looking over 2015, it is clear today that oil prices will continue to dominate our economic and political discussion for much of the year. Perhaps it is a sad thing that such a mundane commodity as petroleum matters so much, but if we weren’t worried about oil, we might be fretting the price of oats. It is worth restating some of the economic effects and previewing the policy discussion about them.

Petroleum prices are part of the costs of almost all goods and services. A nearly 50 percent price drop over the past half year means that the actual costs of production for things big and small have dropped. Sometimes this is very significant, sometimes it is minor, but it is always a cost reduction. This doesn’t always mean that the price will drop for consumers. We know that prices are sticky and for a variety of reasons business may not immediately lower prices just because their costs have dropped.

Of course I wish the prices of goods I buy were more flexible – and I wrote a whole doctoral dissertation on the matter – but the economy still benefits from the gasoline price drop. Businesses may be more profitable and might be able to use the extra revenue to hire more workers or make other investments. If they pass their profits on to owners, this will mean more money for retirees and other stockholders. Either way the money eventually flows back into the economy.

Notably, a positive oil price shock may significantly alter the short-run growth of the economy. There remains great fragility in parts of the U.S. economy, and although the economy is surely getting better, it is far from good. Economists use all kinds of euphemisms to describe a pivotal moment for the economy as it shifts to better performance. None have yet to apply to our current recovery, but gasoline prices might just be the right tonic. Forgive me for using a football analogy, but there is a moment in most football games when it is clear to everyone that one side must win. It is an ethereal moment when victory is largely certain, and isn’t so much dependent on the score or the clock, but the feeling in the air. That moment has not yet happened in this economy, but a year of much lower petroleum prices may well bring us to a full-blown recovery.

This takes us to the inevitable policy discussion. The economy has been performing weakly for seven years. During is time, the Obama administration has done much to try to make it better. Some has helped, but nothing has been curative. At the same time, this administration has actively pursued policies to keep oil prices high, with the secretary of energy openly advocating for much higher prices during the darkest days of the recession. This is no hidden mystery, it was a clear policy choice designed to reduce U.S. oil consumption. However, this is one policy failure most of us will be grateful for.

Link to this commentary: https://commentaries.cberdata.org/767/oil-prices-in-2015

Tags: pres. obama administration, economic recovery, prices and inflation, united states of america


About the Author

Michael Hicks cberdirector@bsu.edu

Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Note: The views expressed here are solely those of the author, and do not represent those of funders, associations, any entity of Ball State University, or its governing body.

© Center for Business and Economic Research, Ball State University

About Ball State CBER Data Center

Ball State CBER Data Center is one-stop shop for economic data including demographics, education, health, and social capital. Our easy-to-use, visual web tools offer data collection and analysis for grant writers, economic developers, policy makers, and the general public.

Ball State CBER Data Center (cberdata.org) is a product of the Center for Business and Economic Research at Ball State University. CBER's mission is to conduct relevant and timely public policy research on a wide range of economic issues affecting the state and nation. Learn more.

Terms of Service

Center for Business and Economic Research

Ball State University • Whitinger Business Building, room 149
2000 W. University Ave.
Muncie, IN 47306-0360
Phone:
765-285-5926
Email:
cber@bsu.edu
Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber
Facebook:
www.facebook.com/BallStateCBER
Twitter:
www.twitter.com/BallStateCBER
Close